Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42666925›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026

Cryoablation combined with immunotherapy: new strategies and progress in the treatment of tumors.

Yuxin Xiang, Lin Yu, Jia Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuxin XiangSchool of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China.
Lin YuSchool of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China.
Jia LiSchool of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, continuous advances in interventional therapies for pulmonary diseases have made minimally invasive treatment an important focus of this field because of its limited trauma, rapid recovery, and reliable efficacy. As a representative minimally invasive modality, cryoablation kills tumor cells mainly through cold-induced cellular injury, vascular injury, and immune modulation. Although existing studies have confirmed the immune-activating effects of cryoablation, cryoablation alone is limited by insufficient antitumor immune intensity and restricted control of distant tumors, making it difficult to maximize systemic antitumor efficacy. Recent evidence suggests that combining cryoablation with immunotherapy may amplify antitumor effects through complementary mechanisms. However, unlike previous reviews that have focused primarily on general mechanisms and preliminary efficacy, few have delved into the translational bottlenecks of cryoablation parameters, treatment sequencing, and lymph-node management. In addition to summarizing the immunological mechanisms, research progress, clinical applications, and current challenges, this review goes beyond mere description by synthesizing evidence on these three underappreciated aspects, proposing a practical sequencing framework, and outlining actionable strategies for lymph-node preservation versus ablation. We further appraise the evidence tumor by tumor and grade it by evidence tier, so that the strength of every recommendation is explicit and the tumor types for which no clinical data exist are named. Together these elements offer a clearer and more clinically instructive perspective for combination immunotherapy and provide a theoretical basis for optimizing treatment strategies for patients with tumors.

Indexed as

combination immunotherapycryoablationimmunotherapyinterventional therapytumors

Identifiers

PMID42666925
PMCPMC13523652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.