ArticleKidney international reports2026
Kidney Allograft Outcomes in Borderline and T Cell-Mediated Rejection With Microvascular Inflammation.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Microvascular inflammation (MVI) is a hallmark feature of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), but its prognostic significance when it occurs with T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) in the absence of other ABMR features remains unclear. Methods: We examined the association between pure TCMR phenotypes, defined by the presence or absence of MVI, and graft survival using restricted mean survival time (RMST), and assessed interactions with rejection involving a "v" lesion. Results: Among 1614 recipients with first biopsy-proven pure TCMR (2010-2023), 85% had no MVI, 8% subthreshold MVI (Banff glomerulitis [g] + peritubular capillaritis [ptc] = 1), and 7% with MVI (g + ptc ≥ 2). Compared with TCMR without MVI, recipients with TCMR + MVI (hazard ratio [HR]; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.57 [1.06-2.34]) had a higher risk of all-cause graft loss, whereas subthreshold MVI was not associated with increased risk. The 5-year RMST was lowest in the MVI group (3.93 [3.53-4.26]), compared with the subthreshold group (4.39 [4.11- 4.60]) and the no MVI group (4.32 [4.24-4.40]). Rejection with a "v" lesion modified this association. Recipients with TCMR + MVI and positive "v" lesion had a 2.77-fold higher risk of graft loss (2.77 [1.64-4.67]), whereas no excess risk was observed in those without vascular lesions. Conclusion: Pure TCMR with MVI, particularly in the setting of a "v" lesion, represents a high-risk phenotype associated with poorer graft survival, warranting mechanistic investigations and targeted therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.