ArticleHeart rhythm O22026
Refining risk stratification for primary prevention ICD therapy: Insights from cardiac MRI in the DO-IT registry.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are recommended for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, reliance on LVEF alone may inadequately identify patients at the highest risk. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), particularly late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM). Methods: This multicenter substudy of the Dutch Outcome in ICD Therapy registry included 252 patients with a reduced LVEF (≤35%) who underwent CMR before primary prevention ICD implantation. NIDCM was the underlying etiology in 52% and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was present in 38%. The median follow-up was 4.3 years. Outcomes were appropriate device therapy (ADT) and all-cause mortality. Results: LGE was present in 70% and was significantly more extensive in patients with ICM than in those with NIDCM. During follow-up, ADT occurred in 15%, and 19% died, with similar rates between the ICM and NIDCM groups. LGE presence and extent were not associated with ADT or mortality, in the overall cohort nor in subgroup analyses stratified by etiology or non-CRT status. In contrast, right ventricular dysfunction and increased left ventricular end-diastolic volume were associated with outcomes. Conclusion: LGE on CMR was not associated with ADT or mortality in patients with ICM or NIDCM, nor in the non-CRT subgroup, suggesting a limited role in guiding ICD therapy. In contrast, markers of biventricular dysfunction and adverse remodeling exhibited a prognostic value, highlighting their potential to refine risk stratification beyond traditional LVEF-based criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.