Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42666885›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm O22026

Refining risk stratification for primary prevention ICD therapy: Insights from cardiac MRI in the DO-IT registry.

Marthe A J Becker, Luuk H G A Hopman, Tom E Verstraelen, Jos Perdeck, Anne-Lotte C J van der Lingen, Anton E Tuinenburg, Lucas V A Boersma, Alexander H Maass, Peter Paul H M Delnoy, Stefan A J Timmer and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Marthe A J BeckerDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Luuk H G A HopmanDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tom E VerstraelenDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jos PerdeckDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anne-Lotte C J van der LingenDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anton E TuinenburgDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lucas V A BoersmaCardiology Department, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Alexander H MaassDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Peter Paul H M DelnoyDepartment of Cardiology, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Stefan A J TimmerDepartment of Cardiology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Tjeerd GermansDepartment of Cardiology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Vokko P van HalmDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arthur A M WildeDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis P AllaartDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
DO-IT investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are recommended for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, reliance on LVEF alone may inadequately identify patients at the highest risk. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), particularly late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM). Methods: This multicenter substudy of the Dutch Outcome in ICD Therapy registry included 252 patients with a reduced LVEF (≤35%) who underwent CMR before primary prevention ICD implantation. NIDCM was the underlying etiology in 52% and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was present in 38%. The median follow-up was 4.3 years. Outcomes were appropriate device therapy (ADT) and all-cause mortality. Results: LGE was present in 70% and was significantly more extensive in patients with ICM than in those with NIDCM. During follow-up, ADT occurred in 15%, and 19% died, with similar rates between the ICM and NIDCM groups. LGE presence and extent were not associated with ADT or mortality, in the overall cohort nor in subgroup analyses stratified by etiology or non-CRT status. In contrast, right ventricular dysfunction and increased left ventricular end-diastolic volume were associated with outcomes. Conclusion: LGE on CMR was not associated with ADT or mortality in patients with ICM or NIDCM, nor in the non-CRT subgroup, suggesting a limited role in guiding ICD therapy. In contrast, markers of biventricular dysfunction and adverse remodeling exhibited a prognostic value, highlighting their potential to refine risk stratification beyond traditional LVEF-based criteria.

Indexed as

Cardiac magnetic resonance imagingIschemic cardiomyopathyMortalityNonischemic dilated cardiomyopathyPrimary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorVentricular arrhythmias

Identifiers

PMID42666885
PMCPMC13523596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.