ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology
Long-Term Motor and Sensory Outcomes of Infantile Esotropia following Bilateral Medial Rectus Recession: A Survival Analysis and Real-World Results.
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate long-term outcomes of bilateral medial rectus recession in infantile esotropia (IET) using survival analysis of real-world data to identify predictors of surgical failure. Methods: This retrospective study included 121 IET patients with ≥12 months of follow-up. Motor success was defined as alignment within ±10 prism diopters at 6 months (early) and final visit (late). Sensory success was defined as binocular single vision (BSV), including fusion with or without stereopsis. Long-term motor stability was evaluated using survival analysis and Cox regression, while sensory outcomes were analyzed using multivariable regression. Results: Median surgical age was 24 months; the mean follow-up was 77.8 ± 59.6 months. Motor success was 56.2% at 6 months and 52.9% at the final follow-up. Cumulative success declined from 95.9% at 1 year to 54.9% at 10 years (median survival: 130 months). Male sex ( Conclusions: Long-term motor alignment is maintained in about half of IET patients, though stability declines over time. Male sex, larger deviation, and higher surgical dose predict failure. Peripheral fusion is frequent, fine stereopsis remains rare, and amblyopia adversely affects sensory outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.