ReviewBelitung nursing journal2026
Nurse-led interventions for cervical cancer patients: A scoping review with an emphasis on East Asian contexts.
Review in Belitung nursing journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nurse-led interventions play a vital role in cervical cancer care across the disease trajectory but are often underappreciated despite their impact on patient-reported outcomes. Objective: This review aimed to map current nurse-led interventions for women with cervical cancer across the disease trajectory, identify key design gaps, reporting, and evaluation to guide practice and research. Methods: The scoping review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework for conducting scoping studies. The included studies were published between 2015 and 2025 and were identified through searches of MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, and ScienceDirect. The final database search was conducted on 31 December 2025. The studies were empirical studies on nurse-led interventions targeting management of cervical cancer patients. The primary results were organized by themes using a line-by-line coding method. Results: Of the 1,220 studies identified, twenty-two met the inclusion criteria. Most studies used quasi-experimental designs, with few randomized, mixed-methods, or qualitative studies. The nurse-led interventions emphasized health education and psychological support, and improved sexual function, mental health, disease knowledge, quality of life, self-efficacy, personal confidence, and body image. Important elements of cervical cancer care such as cost of care, financial burden, palliative and end-of-life care, and cancer recurrence were mostly not addressed by any intervention. Conclusion: The included studies frequently reported positive outcomes associated with nurse-led interventions such as improved patients' sexual function, quality of life, mental health, emotional well-being, family functioning, symptom burden, self-management, knowledge, and satisfaction with care. Registry: PROSPERO [CRD420261277487].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.