ArticleNeurosurgery practice2026
Educational Utility of a Full-Skull 3-Dimensional Model for Skull Base Surgery Training.
Article in Neurosurgery practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesSkull base surgery requires precise 3-dimensional (3D) anatomic understanding and advanced drilling techniques within a confined operative space. Although cadaveric dissection remains the gold standard for training, its availability is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the educational utility of a commercially available full-skull 3D model for skull base surgery training.
methodsA full-skull 3D model reproducing the cranial base and brain was used in a hands-on training session involving 8 neurosurgeons, including 2 residents and 6 board-certified surgeons. Multiple skull base approaches were practiced. In addition, a patient-specific tumor model generated from clinical imaging data was incorporated to simulate pathological anatomy. Participants completed a questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale to assess bone hardness, anatomic accuracy, realism, drilling sensation, safety and usability, and overall satisfaction.
resultsOverall satisfaction with the model was high across all evaluation categories. Anatomic accuracy, realism, and usability received high mean scores. Overlay visualization of individual responses demonstrated consistent trends without reliance on inferential statistics. Qualitative feedback indicated that the model was particularly useful for understanding spatial orientation and approach selection, whereas limitations were noted regarding tactile realism, including uniform bone hardness and dural texture.
conclusionThe full-skull 3D model demonstrated substantial educational value as a supplementary training tool for skull base surgery. By enabling repeated practice, approach comparison, and patient-specific simulation, this model may complement cadaver-based training, particularly for early-stage neurosurgeons. Further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to establish its role within structured skull base education programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.