ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Stage-specific neutrophil states in neonatal injury: from antimicrobial deficiency to pro-resolution repair.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal neutrophils are often described as immature effector cells with limited marrow reserves and reduced antimicrobial capacity. This account is clinically useful but incomplete: individual functions mature at different rates, neutrophil populations are heterogeneous, and observed phenotypes vary with gestational age, maternal health, tissue context, and time after injury. This Mini Review first places neonatal findings against canonical mature-neutrophil functions, then examines context-dependent programs in neonatal sepsis, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and necrotizing enterocolitis. We use state as an operational, cross-sectional description supported by phenotypic, functional, or molecular evidence, without assuming a stable lineage or a proven conversion from inflammatory to reparative cells. Temporal change may instead reflect emergency granulopoiesis, selective recruitment, survival, clearance, or population replacement. Human neonatal studies show that chemotaxis and extracellular-trap formation are often developmentally constrained, whereas phagocytosis, oxidative burst, granule content, and degranulation can be relatively preserved under specific assay conditions. Disease models further reveal competing roles for neutrophils in pathogen control, thromboinflammation, angiogenic support, and resolution. Conflicting findings on extracellular traps in necrotizing enterocolitis illustrate why model, microbial burden, intervention timing, and whether an experiment prevents trap formation or removes established traps must be distinguished. No clinically validated neonatal neutrophil-state classifier exists. Routine laboratory values provide clinical context and trajectories, whereas proposed interventions targeting extracellular traps, myeloperoxidase, trained immunity, lipid mediators, or efferocytosis remain experimental. Taken together, the evidence favors a context-dependent approach that preserves antimicrobial defense while testing ways to limit tissue injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.