ReviewCureus2026
Glycosylated Fibronectin in Fetal Growth Restriction: An Emerging Biomarker of Placental Dysfunction.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a major placenta-mediated pregnancy complication associated with perinatal morbidity, stillbirth, neonatal complications, and long-term cardiometabolic and neurodevelopmental consequences. Its diagnosis remains challenging because fetal smallness alone cannot reliably distinguish constitutionally small fetuses from pathological growth restriction caused by placental insufficiency. Glycosylated fibronectin (GlyFn), a modified extracellular matrix glycoprotein involved in cell adhesion, angiogenesis, endothelial function, and tissue remodeling, has emerged as a promising biomarker of placenta-mediated disease. This review summarizes the biological rationale and current evidence regarding GlyFn in FGR, with emphasis on placental dysfunction, trophoblast invasion, spiral artery remodeling, oxidative stress, endothelial activation, altered angiogenic signaling, and extracellular matrix remodeling. Current data suggest that GlyFn is most consistently associated with preeclampsia, where elevated maternal serum levels have shown diagnostic and prognostic potential. However, direct evidence supporting GlyFn as an independent biomarker of isolated FGR remains limited. Most available findings are derived from preeclampsia cohorts or studies of broader adverse pregnancy outcomes, making it unclear whether GlyFn reflects FGR itself, preeclampsia-related endothelial injury, or general placental stress. GlyFn may be particularly relevant in early-onset placental FGR, where severe malperfusion and endothelial dysfunction are prominent. Its greatest future value may lie in multimarker models combining GlyFn with placental growth factor, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor ratio, fetal biometry, Doppler indices, and placental histopathology. Prospective longitudinal studies using standardized FGR definitions are required before GlyFn can be translated into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.