ArticleJournal of pain research2026
Pain-Related Fear Modulates Attentional Bias for Threat Processing in Chronic Pain: An ERP Study.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comments on "Pain-Related Fear Modulates Attentional Bias for Threat Processing in Chronic Pain: An ERP Study" [Letter].Journal of pain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Pain-related fear (PRF) is increasingly recognized as a clinically relevant psychological factor in chronic pain, yet its role in attentional processing across varying threat levels remains unclear, particularly in functional visceral pain conditions such as epigastric pain syndrome (EPS). Using event-related potentials (ERPs), this study examined how PRF is associated with the attentional processing of emotional faces in patients with EPS. Methods: Twenty-nine patients with EPS were categorized into high- and low-PRF groups based on a composite index derived from validated questionnaires. A three-stimulus oddball paradigm was used to assess neural responses to emotional faces (fearful, sad, and happy). Results: PRF-related group differences emerged selectively for high-threat (fearful) faces. Compared with the low-PRF group, the high-PRF group exhibited reduced P2 amplitudes and attenuated P3 amplitudes specifically for fearful faces, while no group differences were observed for sad or happy faces. The N1 interaction, though significant, did not yield significant pairwise effects, and the N2 showed no PRF-related modulation. Conclusion: These findings provide preliminary evidence that elevated PRF in chronic pain is associated with threat-specific alterations in attentional processing, rather than a generalized hypervigilance or global processing deficit. The selective reduction of perceptual and late-stage resource mobilization for high-threat signals suggests that PRF may disrupt the adaptive allocation of cognitive resources specifically when individuals confront the most salient threat cues. However, given the cross-sectional ERP design and modest sample size, these interpretations should be regarded as preliminary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.