ReviewCureus2026
Montelukast and Bilastine Combination Therapy in Allergic Rhinitis: A Narrative Review of Evidence.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the nasal mucosa triggered by immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated responses to allergens. The release of histamines and leukotrienes results in nasal irritation, excessive secretions, and frequent sneezing, affecting both children and adults. This review aims to provide an updated understanding of AR by evaluating the prevalence, treatment approaches, and clinical effects of bilastine and montelukast in AR management. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify research papers published between January 2003 and September 2023. Studies assessing the clinical efficacy of montelukast and bilastine, alone or in combination, in AR treatment were reviewed. Several clinical studies suggest that montelukast and bilastine combination therapy significantly improves daytime and composite nasal symptoms, including itching, sneezing, and rhinorrhea. Evidence indicates that combination therapy is superior to monotherapy with either drug for managing moderate-to-severe persistent AR. Bilastine, a second-generation antihistamine, offers rapid symptom relief with minimal sedation, while montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, reduces inflammation. Their complementary mechanisms enhance overall efficacy in symptom control. Although combined bilastine and montelukast therapy is supported by growing clinical evidence, data on their comparative effectiveness against other commercially available AR treatments remain limited. Further research is needed to establish optimal treatment strategies and long-term safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.