ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
The cost of ongoing war: escalation of continuous traumatic stress response over time and later functional, adjustment, and affective difficulties.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Continuous Traumatic Stress Response (CTSR) refers to psychological, emotional, and behavioral reactions that emerge under conditions of ongoing, realistic, and future-oriented threat. Recently, CTSR received empirical attention in areas affected by political armed conflict; studies have been cross-sectional. Therefore, there is limited understanding of CTSR dynamics over time. Methods: The current longitudinal study examined changes in CTSR during the Israel-Hamas war and its associations with functioning problems, maladjustment, and psychological burden (anxiety and depression). The study included 519 Israeli adults assessed during weeks 4-6 of the war (T1), and 264 participants during weeks 23-36 (T2). CTSR was evaluated at both waves, and war exposure, functioning problems, maladjustment, and psychological burden at follow-up. Latent change score models estimate within-person change in CTSR and the prospectively associaitons with follow-up outcomes. Results: Higher baseline CTSR and greater increases in CTSR were prospectively associated with greater functioning problems, maladjustment, and psychological burden at follow-up. Conclusions: CTSR may be a dynamic indicator of accumulating psychological risk. Monitoring changes in CTSR during prolonged conflict may help identify individuals at increased risk for later functional impairment, maladjustment, and emotional difficulties. CTSR-informed assessment may improve early identification, triage, and prevention efforts in populations exposed to continuing danger.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.