ArticleiScience2026
Spontaneous emergence of context-dependent statistical learning in humans and neural networks.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans readily extract statistical regularities from experience, yet natural environments require flexible adaptation when associative structures shift across changing contexts, often without warning. Across two experiments, we show that humans can incidentally learn overlapping and conflicting visual associations even when contexts dynamically alternate and remain unsignaled or only minimally cued. To probe the computational mechanisms supporting this adaptive capacity, we trained recurrent neural networks with gated recurrent units on the same statistical learning task without providing any explicit context information. Models with moderate initialized weight variance demonstrated context-dependent learning and most closely matched human learning behavior. These models spontaneously developed distributed internal representations of context that robustly separated conflicting associations and supported rapid adaptation to latent context shifts. Together, these behavioral and computational results advance our understanding of how humans and artificial systems can successfully learn and flexibly retrieve context-dependent associations under challenging conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.