Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42666686›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2026

How Are They Gonna Look at Me? A Constructivist Study of Medical Students' Categorisation and its Impact on Study Experiences.

Albertine Zanting, Janneke Frambach, Anja Krumeich, Agnes Meershoek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Albertine ZantingDepartment of Health, Ethics and Society, School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5258-5050
Janneke FrambachDepartment of Educational Development and Research, School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1527-6539
Anja KrumeichDepartment of Health, Ethics and Society, School Caphri, Care and Public Health Research Institute, School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5399-3868
Agnes MeershoekDepartment of Health, Ethics and Society, School Caphri, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1642-8672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Research shows that medical students from certain minoritised backgrounds often face discrimination and reduced belonging, harming wellbeing and performance. However, such research rarely justifies its focus on these backgrounds, taking the selected categories of minoritized students for granted, even though categorisation itself is neither neutral nor harmless. To offer an alternative perspective, we used theoretical perspectives of categorisation to examine categories students construct for themselves and others, what meanings they attribute to these constructions, and how this affects their study experiences. Method: Using a constructivist approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 students from two Dutch medical programmes. Students reflected on experiences from application to clinical rotations. Transcripts were coded using theoretical concepts of categorisation. The analysis focused on how and when students invoked categories, their attached meanings, and impact. Findings were synthesized into three crafted stories illustrating students' experiences. Results: Students described categorising themselves and others fluidly, shifting across time and context. Categories became salient when students deviated from an implicit norm (e.g., identifying as lesbian in heteronormative environments or Black among white peers). Students and others valued each other positively, yet sometimes overemphasized categories and negatives. Such dynamics shaped feelings of belonging and exclusion and, sometimes, contributed to dropout. Discussion: Improving students' learning experiences requires acknowledging categorisation's omnipresent nature and its interconnected dynamics. Focusing on individuals' experiences and implicit norms - rather than standard categories - in all stages of educational practice and research is essential for fostering diversity and inclusion in the learning and healthcare environment.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalAcademiaEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicNetherlandsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID42666686
PMCPMC13523811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.