Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42666657›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2026

Association Between Mandibular Ramus Morphometry and Mandibular Third Molar Impaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nazanin Salmani, Hooman Shafaee, Mostafa Abtahi, Shayan Yousefi, Amirhossein Rahat Dahmardeh, Seyed MohammadMobin Mousavi, Mahdi Naseri Takaloo, Fatemeh Elahi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nazanin SalmaniStudent Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, mums.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0846-4525
Hooman ShafaeeDepartment of Orthodontic, Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, mums.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7924-4654
Mostafa AbtahiDepartment of Orthodontic, Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, mums.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7670-0279
Shayan YousefiStudent Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, mums.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8333-8544
Amirhossein Rahat DahmardehStudent Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, mums.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4530-0131
Seyed MohammadMobin MousaviStudent Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, mums.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3518-6191
Mahdi Naseri TakalooFaculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, mums.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9248-1384
Fatemeh ElahiFaculty of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, tums.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1863-2507

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mandibular third molar impaction is a common clinical condition associated with various functional and pathological complications. Skeletal and morphometric characteristics of the mandible, particularly mandibular ramus dimensions, have been proposed as potential contributors to impaction risk; however, existing evidence remains inconsistent. Objective: To systematically review and quantitatively synthesize the available evidence on the association between mandibular ramus dimensions (height and width) and mandibular third molar impaction. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with the protocol prospectively registered in PROSPERO (Registration ID: CRD420251238995). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to October 16, 2025. Observational studies evaluating the relationship between mandibular ramus height and/or width and mandibular third molar impaction were included. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models with restricted maximum-likelihood (REML) estimation and Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Ramus height and width were analyzed separately as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses by study design and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist. Results: Eleven studies comprising 3570 participants were included, of which nine contributed to the meta-analysis of ramus height and six to ramus width. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly smaller mandibular ramus height in individuals with impacted mandibular third molars compared with erupted controls (MD = -1.03 mm; 95% CI: -1.85 to -0.21; Conclusion: Reduced mandibular ramus height may be more consistently associated with mandibular third molar impaction than ramus width, although substantial heterogeneity limits definitive conclusions. While sexual dimorphism in ramus morphology is evident, its influence on impaction risk remains unclear. These findings highlight the need for standardized measurement protocols and well-designed longitudinal studies to further clarify the role of mandibular ramus morphology in third molar impaction.

Indexed as

mandibular ramusmandibular third molarmeta-analysispanoramic radiographyramus heightramus widthsystematic reviewthird molar impaction

Identifiers

PMID42666657
PMCPMC13522715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.