ReviewTherapeutic advances in urology
Perioperative treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer in the era of immunotherapy.
Review in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) remains associated with high recurrence and mortality despite radical cystectomy and cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). For decades, perioperative therapy was defined by platinum-based regimens, which improve survival but are limited to fewer than half of patients due to comorbidities. Recent advances in the past year have redefined this landscape. Multiple pivotal phase III trials have demonstrated the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. The phase III trials, KEYNOTE-905/EV-303 and KEYNOTE-B15/EV-304 have established perioperative enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab as a new standard of care for neoadjuvant therapy. Parallel translational research has identified biomarkers that may refine patient selection and optimize therapy. PD-L1 expression, DNA damage repair gene alterations, molecular subtyping, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have all emerged as predictive and prognostic tools. Liquid biopsy approaches may guide adjuvant therapy decisions and facilitate real-time monitoring of minimal residual disease. This review synthesizes the evolving role of perioperative therapies in MIBC, from the historical reliance on cisplatin-based chemotherapy to the transformative integration of immunotherapy, ADCs, and biomarker-guided approaches. Together, these advances represent a significant progress in perioperative bladder cancer care, heralding a shift toward individualized, biomarker-driven strategies that promise improved survival and broader treatment applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.