ArticleSubstance use : research and treatment
Pharmacists' Perceived Knowledge of Kratom and Hemp-Derived Cannabinoids Before and after Education.
Article in Substance use : research and treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Kratom and hemp-derived cannabinoid use has increased in the United States. Objective: Assess pharmacists' perceived knowledge of kratom and hemp-derived cannabinoids and whether it improved following continuing education. Methods: This cross-sectional survey was administered to participants immediately before and after attending a live, one-hour continuing education presentation regarding the pharmacology, uses, risks, and legality of kratom and hemp-derived cannabinoids. The novel, investigator-designed, literature-informed survey assessed the frequency with which they were asked about kratom and hemp-derived cannabinoids in practice, perceived knowledge of the uses, risks, and legality of these substances, and participant's perceived self-efficacy regarding counseling patients about them. The post-education survey also contained questions regarding perceived training value. Any pharmacist who attended the presentation and acknowledged consent was eligible to participate. Non-pharmacist attendees were excluded. Results: In total, 99 participants completed the pre-education survey and 63 the post-education survey. Most were never (81.8%) asked about kratom, while about half (48.5%) were never asked about hemp-derived cannabinoids, with 45.5% asked twice per month or less. Prior to education, most pharmacists did not feel confident discussing common uses, risks, or legal/regulatory status of kratom or hemp-derived cannabinoids and had limited understanding of distinctions between cannabis-related terms. Median pre-education scores ranged from 1-2 (out of 5) across all items. Following education, perceived knowledge and self-efficacy improved across all five items (all p<0.0001), each with post-education medians of 4. Conclusion: This exploratory study indicated that Texas pharmacists' perceived knowledge of kratom and hemp-derived cannabinoids was low, but significantly improved following education on the topic. It also indicated they are not often asked about these substances in day-to-day practice, corroborating previous research that people who use these substances rarely discuss their use with their healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.