ArticleCurrent research in food science2026
Construction of a machine learning-based predictive model for odor-driven behavioral preference of odorant molecules.
Article in Current research in food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How the chemical structures of odorant molecules determine biologically oriented behaviors remains a central challenge at the intersection of food informatics and biology. To identify structural features of odorant molecules that are associated with mouse first-encounter approach-avoidance responses, this study used a published human flavor semantic descriptor database only as a stratification tool to select a semantically diverse set of odorants; the behavioral labels came from the mice's own first-encounter approach-avoidance responses. By integrating multidimensional molecular representations with machine learning algorithms, we established a predictive method for odor-driven behavioral preference. The results showed that, among the prespecified model-representation pipelines evaluated in this study, the Logistic Regression model based on structural keys and physicochemical descriptors achieved the highest mean F1-score (0.812 ± 0.016). Model interpretability analysis indicated that ester groups, aromatic rings, ethers, and branched carbon motifs were more likely to be associated with approach behavior, whereas thioethers, sulfur-containing heterocycles, disulfides, and certain carbonyl/heteroatom environments were more likely to be associated with avoidance behavior. Behavioral experiments using structural analogs provided supporting evidence for an association between local structural modification and shifts in first-encounter approach-avoidance behavior in mice. This study establishes an interpretable olfactory prediction methodology. This methodology provides an interpretable computational framework to support the screening and prioritization of candidate odorant molecules and may inform subsequent human sensory evaluation and product-level validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.