ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2026
Artificial Intelligence in Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Domains, Barriers and a Framework for Future Development.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) within medicine has increased dramatically in the past few years, and applications for point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) have followed a similar trend. Although physicians believe that POCUS AI applications have the potential to improve clinical practice, adoption of current applications remains limited. A lack of outcomes-based evidence, bias within datasets, poor assimilation within current workflows, and regulatory uncertainty are some of the major barriers that lead to poor adoption rates. To improve integration, stakeholders (physician leaders, researchers, health care executives, and industry partners) should begin any new POCUS AI development project by first examining the different domains where POCUS AI applications are most needed, including education, clinical practice, workflow, research, and administration. A gap analysis with clearly defined outcomes should come next, followed by an examination of how the new POCUS AI application will integrate into existing workflows. Training data sets that are reflective of real-world scenarios, including limitations encountered by end users, are essential. POCUS AI applications that integrate with existing workflows, have explainable outputs, and have been codeveloped with end users will improve adoption. Although regulatory pathways are evolving, engaging regulators early in the process and identifying viable reimbursement pathways are key strategies that will improve both the development and adoption of POCUS AI applications in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.