ReviewAdvances in ophthalmology practice and research
A practical starting guide to tear fluid biobanking.
Review in Advances in ophthalmology practice and research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tear fluid is increasingly recognized as a minimally invasive source of biomarkers in various diseases with broad potential for diagnostics and disease monitoring. Biobanking tear fluid samples provides valuable access to high-quality biological samples while reducing the need for new collection efforts. Ensuring appropriate collection and storage conditions is critical for maintaining sample integrity. However, standardized guidelines and operating protocols for tear fluid biobanking are still lacking. Main text: This review synthesizes existing literature on tear fluid biobanking, complemented by additional sources such as reports and online guidelines on biobanking standards and recommendations. Together, these insights provide a practical guide for researchers and institutions aiming to establish a tear fluid biobank or integrate tear fluid samples into existing biobanking infrastructures. This guide outlines key aspects including (i) governance, regulatory, and ethical considerations, (ii) biosafety, infrastructure, and logistics, (iii) collection methods and materials, and (iv) data harmonization through the developed and proposed Tear Fluid-Common Data Elements, which emphasize on the collection, storage, processing, and analysis of biobanked samples. Conclusions: By providing clear and practical guidance, this review supports the standardization of tear fluid biobanking, thereby enhancing the value of these samples for future research and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.