ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Digital Health Delivery Models for Hypertension Self-Care in Asia: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abstract: Hypertension remains a major contributor to cardiovascular morbidity in Asia, where effective long-term disease control depends substantially on patient self-care behaviors. Although digital health interventions are rapidly expanding, evidence regarding the effectiveness of different delivery models across specific self-care domains and clinical outcomes remains fragmented. Purpose: This study aimed to synthesize evidence on digital health delivery models for hypertension self-care in Asian populations and evaluate their effectiveness across self-care domains and clinical outcomes. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guideline. Eligibility criteria were defined using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) framework. PubMed, Scopus, and EBSCOhost were searched for randomized controlled trials published between 2015 and 2026 that evaluated digital health delivery models for hypertension self-care among Asian populations. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool. Data were synthesized descriptively through qualitative content analysis. Results: Fourteen randomized controlled trials involving 2763 participants were included. Four major digital health delivery models were identified: web-based platforms, text messaging, mobile applications, and wearable-integrated systems. These interventions commonly incorporated education, monitoring, reminders, counseling, and feedback components. Overall, 11 of 14 studies (78.6%) reported significant improvements in hypertension self-care, particularly in self-care maintenance and monitoring behaviors. Text messaging-based interventions demonstrated relatively consistent effectiveness, especially among patients with cardiometabolic comorbidities. Several studies also reported reductions in systolic blood pressure, improved medication adherence, and favorable lifestyle modifications, although effects on self-care management were less consistent. Conclusion: Digital health delivery models show considerable potential to improve hypertension self-care in Asian populations, particularly for routine self-management behaviors. Future interventions should prioritize interactive, personalized, and feedback-driven approaches to strengthen complex self-care management and support scalable implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.