ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2026
Sleep bruxism: a novel theoretical perspective through the lens of the free energy principle (FEP).
Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sleep bruxism is a prevalent sleep-related motor phenomenon characterized by rhythmic masticatory muscle activity that ranges from physiological behavior to a condition with clinically significant craniofacial consequences. Existing models emphasize multifactorial risk factors and centrally mediated dysregulation but lack a unified mechanistic account linking neural regulation, autonomic physiology, airway function, craniofacial biomechanics, and the temporal organization of rhythmic masticatory muscle activity. In this Hypothesis and Theory article, we outline a Free Energy Principle (FEP) - informed framework in which sleep bruxism is interpreted as an expression of predictive regulation and active inference within nested craniofacial, autonomic, and respiratory systems, explicitly as a theoretical account rather than as an empirically established mechanism. Within this framework, we introduce the construct of homeostatic latency, defined conceptually as the temporally extended window over which polysomnographic and electromyographic indices of sleep bruxism frequency, intensity, and inter-episode intervals reflect the efficiency of recovering a quasi-stable equilibrium after arousal-related perturbations. From this, we derive testable hypotheses regarding: (i) clustering of rhythmic masticatory muscle activity around micro-arousals and respiratory events, (ii) characteristic autonomic signatures preceding episodes, (iii) homeostatic latency profiles derived from EMG timing measures, (iv) airway-related phenotypes and responses to mandibular advancement devices, and (v) differentiated profiles across stress-related, arousal-related, respiratory - airway protective, and neuromodulatory sleep bruxism endotypes. In addition, we briefly indicate how an FEP-informed ontological framework for SB could, in future work, be extended into a domain-specific, knowledge-graph - based representation to support integration of multimodal data and hypothesis-driven computational modeling, while emphasizing that such tools are not developed or validated in the present article. Overall, the framework aims to reconcile sleep bruxism as both behavior and condition, in line with contemporary consensus views, and to generate falsifiable predictions for future empirical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.