ArticleMilitary Medical Research2026
Therapeutic hypoxia to protect and revive ischemic heart and brain.
Article in Military Medical Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although hypoxia plays a central role in the pathobiology of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, controlled hypoxic stimuli, such as intermittent hypoxia conditioning (IHC), can trigger beneficial adaptations that counteract those diseases. IHC has been studied as a readily administered, non-pharmacological intervention for almost a century, it has not yet been widely adopted in clinical practice. Growing evidence demonstrates the beneficial preventive and therapeutic effects of IHC on the cardiovascular system, and although less conclusively established, on the brain. Moreover, IHC is highly feasible and raises few safety concerns. A notable limitation, similar to that of remote ischemic conditioning, is the lack of refined IHC protocols for personalized, disease-specific applications in the individual patient. Significant progress has been achieved in addressing this limitation. For example, increasingly sophisticated modern hypoxia equipment permits customization of IHC parameters according to each individual's responses to and tolerance of hypoxia. Still to be evaluated are the persistence of IHC's effects and the capacity of IHC booster protocols to renew its benefits. Comparative analyses of the mechanisms and efficacy of IHC and remote ischemic conditioning could aid in defining their respective applications and possible synergistic effects. This perspective article summarizes the historical development of IHC, presents a selection of preclinical and clinical studies exemplifying recent research progress, and discusses strategies to address the lingering concerns limiting clinical IHC applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.