ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2026
Degree-based topological indices and their graph energies in the QSPR analysis and ranking of UV-filter compounds.
Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultraviolet (UV) filters are essential ingredients in sunscreens and personal care products, and understanding their physicochemical properties is important for evaluating their performance and applicability. In this study, selected degree-based topological indices and their corresponding graph-energy descriptors were investigated as molecular descriptors for a set of commercially relevant UV-filter compounds. Quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models were developed for molecular weight, complexity, XlogP, water solubility, topological polar surface area, refractivity, and polarizability. The results indicate that both classes of descriptors exhibit strong predictive potential for molecular weight, complexity, refractivity, and polarizability, while weaker relationships were observed for XlogP, water solubility, and polar surface area. The developed models were evaluated using regression analysis, leave-one-out cross-validation, and Monte Carlo validation, which produced consistent results for the well-performing properties. Furthermore, TOPSIS, SAW, and VIKOR methods were employed to rank the investigated UV-filters based on their physicochemical characteristics. The resulting rankings showed strong agreement, identifying Diethylhexyl Butamido Triazone, Ethylhexyl Triazone, and Bisoctrizole as the most promising candidates. The findings highlight the potential of degree-based topological descriptors and their graph energies for QSPR modeling, while the MCDM framework provides a systematic approach for the comparative evaluation and prioritization of UV-filter compounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.