ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing using few-shot learning.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sleep-Disordered Breathing (SDB) is a common and clinically significant disorder characterized by recurrent airflow limitation and oxygen desaturation during sleep, which can lead to serious cardiovascular and metabolic complications. Accurate and early diagnosis of SDB is crucial for timely clinical intervention and risk stratification, yet diagnostic results are often influenced by substantial variations in physicians' clinical experience and diagnostic skills across different regions, particularly in large-scale screening and real-world medical settings. However, existing diagnostic methods based on traditional machine learning or fine-tuned deep models often suffer from limited labeled data, poor generalization in few-shot scenarios, and insufficient exploitation of medical domain knowledge. To address these challenges, in this paper, we propose a few-shot method that integrates prompt learning with contrastive learning for SDB diagnosis, short for SDB-FL. Specifically, SDB-FL employs a manual prompting strategy based on handcrafted templates, together with a knowledgeable verbalizer that incorporates medical domain knowledge, to activate latent domain knowledge embedded in pre-trained language models, thereby enabling effective task adaptation under data-scarce conditions. Meanwhile, contrastive learning is introduced to enhance the discriminative ability of representations by promoting intra-class compactness and inter-class separability at the semantic level. Experimental results on both English and Chinese datasets demonstrate that our SDB-FL consistently outperforms strong baseline methods across multiple few-shot settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.