ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Clinical and pathological indicators for predicting disease-free survival after radical surgery in elderly patients with early-stage triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Elderly patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer are underrepresented in clinical trials, and recurrence prediction models tailored to this population are lacking. We aimed to develop a prediction tool using routinely available clinicopathological indicators. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 215 women aged ≥60 years with stage IA-IIB triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent radical or modified radical mastectomy. Candidate predictors were screened by univariate Cox regression and entered into a multivariable Cox model with backward elimination. A nomogram was constructed and internally validated using bootstrap resampling. Discrimination was assessed by Harrell's C-index and time-dependent area under the curve (AUC). Risk groups were defined using tertiles of the model-derived risk score. Decision curve analysis compared the net benefit with TNM stage alone. Results: Four variables were retained: TNM stage, Ki-67 percentage, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and postoperative chemotherapy. The bootstrap-corrected C-index was 0.793. Time-dependent AUCs were 0.934, 0.866, and 0.796 at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The three risk groups showed clearly separated disease-free survival curves. The nomogram yielded a higher net benefit than TNM stage alone across threshold probabilities of 5% to 40%. Conclusions: All model inputs were derived from standard preoperative evaluations and postoperative treatment records. For an older population with uneven access to molecular biomarkers, this nomogram can inform adjuvant treatment decisions using data already available. External validation in an independent cohort is needed before clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.