ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Fall risk assessment via multi-batch plantar pressure data fusion: an ensemble framework integrating global and local features.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Falls seriously threaten the health and independence of older adults. Existing plantar pressure-based fall risk assessment methods often rely on single datasets and global features, limiting generalizability across data distributions. Methods: To enhance cross-batch robustness, this study integrated plantar pressure data from two independent batches with inherent distributional differences. Eighty older adults performed a 2-min walking task while pressure signals were collected using an intelligent footwear system. A feature set of 44 global and 456 local features was constructed, and a four-model ensemble comprising two MLPs and two 1D-CNNs was developed. Model performance was evaluated using 8-fold stratified cross-validation, Mann-Whitney U-based pre-selection, and SHAP/Grad-CAM interpretability analyses. Results: The ensemble achieved an overall accuracy of 86.25%, outperforming the best single model (MLP1, 80.0%). Performance remained stable across the two batches, with accuracies of 86.0% and 86.7%, corresponding to a fluctuation of 0.7 percentage points. This fluctuation was substantially lower than those observed for the single models; for example, CNN2 fluctuated by 9.3 percentage points. Discussion: These findings suggest that fusing multi-batch plantar pressure data with an ensemble integrating global and local features can help mitigate the impact of cross-batch distribution shifts on model performance and improve the stability of fall risk assessment, thereby providing a methodological basis for its translation from research settings to practical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.