ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Risk prediction of patients with perioperative pneumonia exacerbation being transferred to the ICU based on different machine learning methods.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a prediction model for the risk of patients with perioperative pneumonia exacerbation being transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) based on different machine learning algorithms and to evaluate its predictive efficacy. Methods: A total of 309 surgical inpatients (2022-2025) were included; 80 (25.89%) were transferred to the ICU due to exacerbation of pneumonia. Patients were randomly divided in a 7:3 into training (217) and validation (92) sets. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was applied to identify predictors of ICU transfer following pneumonia exacerbation. Four models (RF, SVM, LR, and GBM) were constructed to predict ICU transfer in patients with perioperative pneumonia exacerbation. Performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) method was used to explain the contribution of the variables to the optimal model's predictions. Results: The LASSO selected surgery type, surgery duration, ASA class, and WBC count. Among the four models, the SVM model achieved the highest AUC in the validation set (0.817), with a training set AUC of 0.862. The calibration was good, and the DCA showed a net clinical benefit. SHAP confirmed that all four were key predictors. Two cases illustrated model use: an ICU-transferred patient had a SHAP score of 0.897, while a non-transferred patient scored 0.073. Conclusion: In this study, four machine learning models were developed and validated to predict ICU transfer in patients with perioperative pneumonia exacerbation. The SVM model showed the highest validation AUC among the four models. WBC count, duration of surgery, ASA grade, and type of surgery were identified as key risk factors for progression from pneumonia exacerbation to ICU admission. However, as a single-center study with internal validation only, external validation is required before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.