ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Deep learning-based craniosynostosis classification via suture segmentation and mask-weighted classification.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Early diagnosis of craniosynostosis (CSO) is critical to preventing neurological complications, yet skull X-ray interpretation remains subjective, and existing deep learning models often rely on secondary cranial deformations rather than the primary pathology. Methods: To address this limitation, we propose an Integrated Suture Segmentation and Classification Pipeline that explicitly learns suture information to enhance anatomical validity and diagnostic accuracy. We constructed a balanced dataset of 1,088 skull X-ray images from 368 unique patients and developed a segmentation model to identify coronal, sagittal, and lambdoid sutures. Crucially, we introduced a Mask-weighted 4-channel Input strategy, utilizing predicted suture probability maps as weights to guide the classification model's attention toward suture regions. Results: Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed method with a DenseNet-161 backbone achieved an image-level Accuracy of 0.925 and an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.980. Furthermore, exam-level diagnosis via multi-view aggregation significantly improved performance, yielding an Accuracy of 0.941 and an AUROC of 0.994. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) analysis demonstrated that the model's attention is primarily directed toward specific suture lines rather than global skull shape, suggesting that the model prioritizes anatomical features over secondary deformations commonly seen in conditions like positional plagiocephaly. Discussion: This study presents a clinically interpretable and high-performance deep learning framework, highlighting its potential as a robust computer-aided referral decision support tool for primary care settings, facilitating timely specialist assessment while minimizing the need for unnecessary radiation-intensive CT scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.