ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Environment or economy? Individual and country-level predictors: an international comparative analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to examine the individual and country-level determinants of individuals' preferences between environmental protection and economic growth within an international comparative framework. Conducted across 66 countries as part of the 7th Wave of the World Values Survey (WVS), the study is based on a sample of 86,532 individuals who provided valid responses to item Q111. The variables identified were, at the individual level, education, gender, age, income and place of residence; and at the country level, GDP per capita, duration of compulsory education, expenditure on education and CO₂ emissions. The study's data were analyzed using weighted logistic regression models incorporating country fixed effects. The findings of the study indicate that the strongest individual factor increasing an individual's likelihood of prioritizing the environment is level of education; women exhibit higher environmental preferences than men, and younger people exhibit higher environmental preferences than older people. Individual income level and urban residence, on the other hand, are negatively associated with environmental prioritization. At the country level, per capita GDP, education expenditure and the duration of compulsory education are positive predictors of environmental prioritization, while CO₂ emissions are a negative predictor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.