Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42666231›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Environment or economy? Individual and country-level predictors: an international comparative analysis.

Fatih Kaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fatih KayaDepartment of Social Studies Education, Faculty of Education, İnönü University, Malatya, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to examine the individual and country-level determinants of individuals' preferences between environmental protection and economic growth within an international comparative framework. Conducted across 66 countries as part of the 7th Wave of the World Values Survey (WVS), the study is based on a sample of 86,532 individuals who provided valid responses to item Q111. The variables identified were, at the individual level, education, gender, age, income and place of residence; and at the country level, GDP per capita, duration of compulsory education, expenditure on education and CO₂ emissions. The study's data were analyzed using weighted logistic regression models incorporating country fixed effects. The findings of the study indicate that the strongest individual factor increasing an individual's likelihood of prioritizing the environment is level of education; women exhibit higher environmental preferences than men, and younger people exhibit higher environmental preferences than older people. Individual income level and urban residence, on the other hand, are negatively associated with environmental prioritization. At the country level, per capita GDP, education expenditure and the duration of compulsory education are positive predictors of environmental prioritization, while CO₂ emissions are a negative predictor.

Indexed as

educationenvironmental priorityenvironment-economy trade-offpost-materialismWorld Values Survey

Identifiers

PMID42666231
PMCPMC13521832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.