ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Structured MOAKS-based MRI features for predicting medial joint space narrowing progression: a comparative osteoarthritis initiative study.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a major cause of pain and disability, yet baseline radiographic severity grading provides only modest prediction of structural progression. We evaluated whether structured MRI-derived MOAKS features improve prediction of full-grade medial joint space narrowing (JSN) progression, and whether deep multimodal fusion adds value beyond structured feature models. Methods: We performed a patient-independent internal-validation study using the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Full-grade medial joint-space-narrowing (JSN) progression was defined as an increase of at least one grade between baseline and fixed 48-month central radiographic readings from the same longitudinal reading project. The final analytic cohort included 2,899 knees from 2,392 participants, partitioned at the participant level into training, validation, and held-out test sets of 2,050, 421, and 428 knees. We compared a radiographic baseline model (RBM), raw-MOAKS model (RMO), structured MRI/radiographic model (SMR), and radiograph-plus-MOAKS ResNet50 fusion model (XMF). AUPRC was primary; uncertainty was estimated with 2,000 patient-cluster bootstrap replicates. Results: Progression prevalence was 10.0%. On the held-out test set (40 progressor knees), AUPRC/AUROC were 0.220 (95% CI 0.142-0.331)/0.748 (0.663-0.827) for RBM, 0.412 (0.260-0.576)/0.805 (0.726-0.878) for RMO, 0.345 (0.219-0.507)/0.801 (0.725-0.871) for SMR, and 0.301 (0.191-0.464)/0.768 (0.679-0.852) for XMF. Compared with RBM, AUPRC increased by 0.192 (0.087-0.313) for RMO and 0.125 (0.042-0.233) for SMR; the corresponding AUROC differences were 0.057 (-0.012 to 0.123) and 0.053 (0.004-0.105). XMF did not improve on SMR in AUPRC or AUROC (differences -0.044 [-0.135 to 0.060] and -0.033 [-0.092 to 0.018], respectively). A stronger clinical-radiographic comparator achieved AUPRC/AUROC 0.251/0.759, increasing to 0.355/0.813 after adding MOAKS. Conclusion: Baseline MOAKS features provided prognostic information beyond radiographic or clinical-radiographic severity for fixed 48-month medial JSN progression. In this selected MOAKS-scored cohort, adding a baseline-radiograph ResNet50 encoder did not improve discrimination over the structured models. The finite number of test events, selected MOAKS availability, calibration requirements, and lack of external validation preclude claims of clinical readiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.