ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Building an interpretable machine learning prognosis prediction model-based on baseline examinations of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing surgery.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To create an interpretable machine learning model based on non-invasive biomarkers for the early diagnosis and improved prognostic value of esophageal cancer. We gathered a private dataset at Sichuan Cancer Hospital, comprising 3204 esophageal cancer patients who underwent surgery. Baseline markers and preoperative biochemical blood tests were thoroughly reviewed. The necessary factors were identified using an elastic net, and 27 machine learning methods were used to construct prediction models. The random forest model was chosen for its high performance, and additional optimization was performed using the White Shark Optimizer (WSO) algorithm. To improve the model's interpretability, the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) technique was used. We proposed an interpretable machine learning framework for exploratory early risk stratification of postoperative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients using routinely available preoperative baseline examinations. The random forest (RF) model achieved 0.74 accuracy and 0.72 F1 score after 1 year. It was adjusted to 0.69 in the Area Under the Curve (AUC). Gender and blood magnesium levels were the best six characteristics that affected the 1-year and 5-year survival rates. The model with the highest discriminative ability accurately predicted the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients in the test population. Our research led to the creation of a machine learning model that accurately predicts the prognosis of esophageal cancer and identifies early indicators of adverse outcomes. SHAP-improved interpretability facilitates physician-patient interaction and trust and promotes individualized therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.