SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Risk factors for post-COVID-19 condition among previously hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-COVID-19 condition is a major source of long-term morbidity after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 may be at particularly high risk because hospitalization often reflects greater acute disease severity and comorbidity burden. However, evidence on risk factors in previously hospitalized populations remains inconsistent due to differences in outcome definitions, follow-up periods, and analytical approaches. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify risk factors associated with post-COVID outcomes among patients previously hospitalized for COVID-19. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA 2020 principles. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and the WHO COVID-19 Global Literature Database were searched for studies published between 1 January 2020 and 24 February 2026. Eligible studies included hospitalized patients with confirmed or probable COVID-19, assessed post-acute outcomes at least 4 weeks after acute infection, hospitalization, recovery, or discharge, and evaluated at least one candidate risk factor. Adjusted effect estimates were prioritized, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed when at least two comparable estimates were available. Results: Eleven studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and seven contributed to quantitative meta-analysis. Five risk-factor groups were pooled: female sex, acute disease severity or respiratory support, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, vaccination status, and hypertension. Female sex was associated with higher odds of post-COVID outcomes (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.60-2.35; Conclusion: Among previously hospitalized COVID-19 patients, the most consistent risk factors for post-COVID outcomes were female sex, greater acute disease severity or respiratory support, ICU admission, no or incomplete vaccination, and hypertension. These findings support risk-based post-discharge follow-up, although the evidence remains limited by heterogeneous outcome definitions and the small number of studies available for several risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.