SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Efficacy and safety of insulin icodec compared with insulin efsitora in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We conducted this network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of insulin icodec vs insulin efsitora for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: We conducted a comprehensive systematic search across PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase up to November 11, 2025. Eligible trials compared insulin icodec and insulin efsitora against each other, placebo or other glucose-lowering drugs. Primary outcome was change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were change in body weight, percentage of patients achieving HbA1c < 7%, change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and safety outcomes including level 1 hypoglycemia, level 2 or level 3 hypoglycemia, adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs). We used version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool to assess the risk of bias. A frequentist network meta-analysis was used to calculate the risk ratios or mean difference with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Results: Thirteen RCTs involving 7,402 participants were included. Insulin icodec resulted in a lower HbA1c level compared to insulin efsitora, but was associated with a higher incidence of level 1 hypoglycemia. The two treatments showed no significant differences in other outcomes, including change in body weight, percentage of patients achieving HbA1c <7%, change in FPG, incidence of level 2 or 3 hypoglycemia, AEs, and SAEs. Compared to daily insulins, insulin icodec led to lower HbA1c levels. Weight gain was lower with insulin glargine than with insulin icodec. A higher percentage of patients in the icodec group achieved HbA1c <7% compared to those receiving daily insulins. Regarding safety outcomes, insulin degludec had a lower incidence of both level 1 and level 2 or 3 hypoglycemia than the other three insulins. Insulin icodec showed a higher incidence of level 1 hypoglycemia than insulin glargine. Additionally, the incidence of AEs was higher with insulin icodec than with insulin degludec. Conclusions: In patients with T2D, once-weekly insulin icodec may provide slightly better glycaemic control than daily insulin. Insulin icodec was more effective than insulin efsitora in reducing HbA1c levels; however, this benefit was offset by a significantly higher risk of level 1 hypoglycemia. The two insulins were comparable in terms of body weight change, glycemic target achievement, FPG reduction, and safety profiles, including level 2 or 3 hypoglycemia, AEs, and SAEs. Direct head to head RCTs are warranted to confirm these findings. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420251177019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.