ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Long-term outcomes and age-dependent recovery trajectories following short-term spinal cord stimulation in patients with disorders of consciousness.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate long-term changes in consciousness and age-related recovery patterns in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDoC) following spinal cord stimulation (stSCS), and to explore whether early postoperative neurological improvement is associated with long-term outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study included 30 patients with pDoC who underwent stSCS and were followed for 24 months. Consciousness was assessed using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) at baseline, 3 days, 14 days, 12 months, and 24 months. Patients were stratified into younger (≤50 years) and older (>50 years) groups. Longitudinal changes in CRS-R scores were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, and linear regression was performed to evaluate the association between early neurological improvement at 14 days and 12-month outcomes. Results: CRS-R scores progressively increased during the 24-month follow-up, with significantly higher scores at 12 months (10.47 ± 6.52) and 24 months (11.84 ± 6.38) compared with baseline (6.17 ± 2.67, both Conclusion: Patients with pDoC showed sustained CRS-R improvement after stSCS during long-term follow-up. Age appeared to influence the pattern of recovery, with younger patients showing earlier improvement, although overall long-term outcomes were comparable between age groups. Early improvement was associated with better long-term outcomes, suggesting potential prognostic value. The specific contribution of stSCS requires further validation in prospective controlled studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.