Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42666087›Full record

ArticleSpecial care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry

Oral Health Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Pregnant Women in Routine Prenatal Care in South China: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Xiaojie Lin, Lanlan Jiang, Zhenhua Pang, Sumei Wang, Qixin Zeng, Zuke Ya, Yuanyuan Peng, Yuxiao Huang, Qiaozhi Jiang, Renchuan Tao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaojie Lin *College & Hospital of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Lanlan Jiang *College & Hospital of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2666-9883
Zhenhua Pang *College & Hospital of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Sumei WangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Qixin ZengCollege & Hospital of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Zuke YaCollege & Hospital of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yuanyuan PengCollege & Hospital of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yuxiao HuangCollege & Hospital of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Qiaozhi JiangCollege & Hospital of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Renchuan TaoCollege & Hospital of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9647-0757

Funding

Guangxi Health Committee Z2016454Guangxi Natural Science Foundation 2023GXNSFDA026018Guangxi Youth Science and Technology Talent Support Program 2025YESSGX095National Natural Science Foundation of China 82370959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysiological changes during pregnancy can increase the risk of oral diseases in women, which may directly affect the health status of their newborns. This cross-sectional study aims to assess the oral health knowledge, attitudes, and practices of pregnant women in South China, as well as their associated factors.

methodsA cross-sectional survey on oral health was carried out between June 2016 and June 2017. The study involved 517 pregnant women recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University during their visits for either routine prenatal care or dental services.

resultsAccording to the survey, while over 90% of pregnant women recognized the importance of regular brushing and gargling, only approximately half were aware of the benefits of pit and fissure sealants (50.3%) and fluoride treatments (48.4%). Moreover, merely 9.3% had undergone routine dental check-ups before pregnancy. In terms of daily oral hygiene, 87.2% reported brushing at least twice daily, yet the proportions incorporating flossing (17.8%) and gargling (43.7%) were considerably lower. Multivariate analysis showed that older age, urban residency, nulliparity, higher education and dental insurance were factors potentially associated with better oral health knowledge, attitudes, and practices (all p < 0.05). Of note, education and method of dental payment consistently exhibited positive effects across multiple models.

conclusionsIn conclusion, while the majority of pregnant women possessed satisfactory oral health knowledge, their practical implementation of specific oral hygiene measures and routine dental attendance were insufficient. Education and dental payment method may play a pivotal role in shaping oral health knowledge, attitudes and practices.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeOral HealthPrenatal CareAdolescentAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansOral HygienePregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultoral attitudeoral knowledgeoral practicepregnant womanrelated factorroutine prenatal care

Identifiers

PMID42666087
PMCPMC13525392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.