Gene-level complexity explains genome-wide variation in the distribution of fitness effects.

The distribution of fitness effects (DFE)-describing how harmful, neutral, or beneficial new mutations are-is central to understanding how populations evolve. Although the DFE varies across genomes and species, it remains unclear which aspects of genomic organization drive this variation. Here, we inferred gene-level selective constraints across the genomes of Mus musculus castaneus, Drosophila melanogaster and Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a combination of population genetics and machine learning trained on diverse gene features. Many gene features were predictive of selective constraint, with conservation, gene structure, and expression being the most informative. These selective constraints delineated gene classes with distinct DFEs. Genes with higher connectivity and expression-features reflecting how many traits a gene influences-experienced stronger and less dispersed deleterious effects with increasing selective constraint. Between species, the rate of adaptation decreased with increasing organismal complexity, whereas across the genome it did not decrease monotonically with selective constraint, but tended to be higher at intermediate levels. While between-species comparisons of DFE parameters were less consistent with predictions of Fisher's geometric model (FGM) based on organismal complexity, variation in DFE parameters across the genome aligned more closely with FGM when complexity was considered at the gene level. Our results suggest that gene-level complexity, captured by genomic feature proxies, provides a more informative definition of complexity for DFE variation than organism-level labels, and highlight the value of using gene features collectively to link genomic architecture, fitness landscapes, and patterns of molecular evolution.