Trial reportDigestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society2026
Submucosal Lidocaine Injection in Colonic Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Single-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesColonic spasm is one of the major technical challenges encountered during colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), impairing visualization of the dissection plane and scope maneuverability. Submucosal lidocaine injection may help to overcome this challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of submucosal lidocaine injection during colonic ESD.
methodsIn this single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 110 patients scheduled for colonic ESD were randomly assigned to the lidocaine or control group. In the lidocaine group, 1% lidocaine with 0.6% sodium alginate was used for submucosal injection; in the control group, saline with 0.6% sodium alginate was used. The primary outcome was procedure time. Secondary outcomes included en bloc and R0 resection rates, incidence of severe spasms, number of antispasmodic administrations, operator satisfaction, and adverse events.
resultsThe median procedure time was numerically shorter in the lidocaine group but did not reach statistical significance (67.5 vs. 78.0 min, p = 0.114). The en bloc and R0 resection rates were 100% and 84.6% in the lidocaine group, and 96.3% and 81.5% in the control group, respectively. Severe spasms occurred less frequently in the lidocaine group (34.6% vs. 74.1%), with fewer antispasmodic administrations (median, 1 vs. 2) and higher operator satisfaction scores (median, 4.0 vs. 2.5). No increase in adverse events was observed.
conclusionsSubmucosal lidocaine injection did not significantly shorten procedure time, although it may serve as a useful adjunct for preventing colonic spasms during ESD.
trial registrationThe study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT1051230189).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.