Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42666011›Full record

ArticlePharmacotherapy2026

Safety of Coadministration of Continuous Infusions of Propofol and Clevidipine: A Multi-Site Retrospective Analysis.

Micaela N Warfield, Kristin C Cole, Kiyan Heybati, Nicholas J Vollmer, Erin D Wieruszewski, Hemang Yadav, Alejandro A Rabinstein, Caitlin S Brown

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Micaela N WarfieldDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8266-8590
Kristin C ColeDivision of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8783-0191
Kiyan HeybatiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4465-2249
Nicholas J VollmerDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3400-3811
Erin D WieruszewskiDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7703-2233
Hemang YadavDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1889-2524
Alejandro A RabinsteinDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8359-2838
Caitlin S BrownDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7413-4736

Funding

Mayo Midwest Pharmacy Research Committee
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients often receive propofol for sedation and clevidipine for hypertension in the intensive care unit. Both agents are formulated as a lipid emulsion, which may increase the risk of hypertriglyceridemia and acute pancreatitis with their coadministration. We aimed to determine the incidence of hypertriglyceridemia and acute pancreatitis with concurrent administration of propofol and clevidipine and identify patient risk factors for hypertriglyceridemia.

methodsThis was a multicenter retrospective study of adult patients (≥ 18 years old) receiving concurrent propofol and clevidipine infusions for ≥ 6 h. The primary outcome was the frequency of triglyceride levels greater than 400 mg/dL and acute pancreatitis. The secondary outcome was risk factors associated with hypertriglyceridemia during concurrent propofol and clevidipine infusions until both infusions had been discontinued. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess risk factors of hypertriglyceridemia in patients receiving concurrent propofol and clevidipine infusions.

resultsAcross 1,226 patients, the median duration of infusion overlap was 12.4 [interquartile range (IQR) 8.3, 22.7] hours. The mean age of the cohort was 59.6 [standard deviation (SD) 14.9] years, and 59.4% were male. Assuming those without a triglyceride level drawn did not have hypertriglyceridemia, hypertriglyceridemia after initiation of propofol and clevidipine infusion was found in 7.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.3% to 9.3%] of the entire cohort. Twenty-six patients (2.1%) had a diagnosis of pancreatitis after initiation of lipid infusions, of which 12 cases were possibly infusion-related, and one case was likely infusion-related. After calculating the Naranjo Scale, all 13 cases of pancreatitis were possibly related to propofol or clevidipine infusions. Based on a multivariable logistic regression of those with a triglyceride level available, risk factors for hypertriglyceridemia included pancreatitis within the past 5 years [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.77, 95% CI, 1.23 to 6.23] and statin use (aOR 1.94, 95% CI, 1.13 to 3.34).

conclusionsIn our cohort of patients receiving concurrent propofol and clevidipine, the frequency of hypertriglyceridemia and acute pancreatitis was low. Further comparative studies are warranted to assess the risk of pancreatitis with the addition of clevidipine to propofol.

Indexed as

HypertriglyceridemiaPancreatitisPropofolPyridinesAgedFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTriglyceridesclevidipinePropofolPyridinesTriglyceridesacute pancreatitisclevidipinehypertriglyceridemialipid emulsionpropofolrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID42666011
PMCPMC13525345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.