ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2026
Revisiting the PCR-Based Molecular Approaches for Mycotoxigenic Fusarium Species Detection and Quantification in Wheat.
Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fusarium species cause yield losses in wheat production through fusarium head blight (FHB) and the associated contamination of regulated mycotoxins, such as trichothecenes and zearalenone. Despite the widespread use of PCR-based molecular approaches for Fusarium detection, quantification, and chemotyping, most primers were developed prior to both modern phylogenetic reclassification and the availability of high-quality genome assemblies, leaving their specificity and robustness largely untested. Existing PCR- and qPCR-based assays for Fusarium detection in wheat were reviewed and re-evaluated in silico using a curated genome panel. Of 53 species-specific primer pairs, 14 (26.4%) achieved high-specificity grades (A-B), whereas 25 (47.2%) were lower performing (D-E), mainly due to cross-reactivity or inconsistent target amplification. Chemotype assays targeting TRI and ZEN genes showed stronger agreement with reported chemotypes, especially for informative TRI loci such as Tri3, Tri7, and Tri12. To support improved qPCR assay design and reporting, we propose FusaMIQE, a Fusarium-adapted framework based on MIQE 2.0 guidelines, tailored to the specific challenges of Fusarium diagnostics in wheat. Together, this manuscript provides the first in silico assessment of PCR/qPCR primers as diagnostic tools for FHB pathogens and associated recommendations for good practice (FusaMIQE) of Fusarium diagnostics in wheat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.