ArticleMolecular autism2026
Social enhancement of associative learning in neurotypical, speaking autistic, and minimally speaking autistic preschoolers.
Article in Molecular autism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAssociative learning, defined as the ability to form connections between events based on temporal or spatial contiguity, is typically enhanced by social stimuli. Whether social stimuli similarly enhance associative learning in autism, particularly among minimally speaking children, is unknown. This study examined social enhancement of associative learning in neurotypical (NT), autistic preschoolers who use spoken language (ASD-S), and minimally speaking autistic (ASD-MS) preschoolers.
methodsSeventy-two children aged 24-56 months (19 NT, 30 ASD-S, 23 ASD-MS) completed a novel eye-tracking task. During 4 learning trials, neutral cues were associated with the appearance of a social or a non-social stimulus in different areas of the screen. In subsequent test trials, only the neutral cue was shown, allowing assessment of (a) associative learning (i.e., preferential looking toward the previously paired area of the screen) and (b) enhancement of associative learning in the social condition. General linear models evaluated group differences across conditions.
resultsWhen the neutral cue was paired with the social stimulus, during the test trial NT and ASD-S preschoolers looked longer toward the area where the social stimuli had previously appeared, compared to the area associated with the non-social stimulus (NT: p < .001; ASD-S: p = .04). In contrast, ASD-MS preschoolers showed no significant difference in their attention to the areas previously associated with social or non-social stimuli. Analyses focused on differential scores (attention toward the social-paired location minus the non-social-paired location) significantly favored the social condition in NT (p = .005) and ASD-S children (p = .007), but not in ASD-MS children. Between-group comparisons showed greater social enhancement in NT compared with ASD-MS preschoolers (p = .03). LIMITATIONS: The social stimuli used in the experiment may not fully capture the complexity of everyday social interactions.
conclusionsSocial stimuli enhanced associative learning in neurotypical and speaking autistic preschoolers, but not in their minimally speaking autistic peers. This pattern suggests meaningful heterogeneity in the mechanisms supporting social learning across the autism spectrum and underscores the need to consider spoken language abilities when characterizing learning profiles in autism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.