Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42665806›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2026

Building meaningful partnerships: engaging and co-developing a patient advisory council to inform the implementation of person-centred quality indicators in Alberta primary care.

Matthew Luzentales-Simpson, Ingrid Nielssen, Fakhriyya Aghabayli, Sadia Ahmed, Kalpana Thapa Bajgain, Ifrah Anjum, Veronika Kiryanova, Safa Ahmed, Kim Giroux, D'Arcy Duquette and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Matthew Luzentales-SimpsonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. Matthew.LuzentalesSi@ucalgary.ca.
Ingrid NielssenDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Fakhriyya AghabayliDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Sadia AhmedDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Kalpana Thapa BajgainDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Ifrah AnjumPerson-Centred Quality Indicators Patient Advisory Council, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Veronika KiryanovaPerson-Centred Quality Indicators Patient Advisory Council, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Safa AhmedPerson-Centred Quality Indicators Patient Advisory Council, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Kim GirouxPerson-Centred Quality Indicators Patient Advisory Council, Calgary, AB, Canada.
D'Arcy DuquettePerson-Centred Quality Indicators Patient Advisory Council, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Eleanor BenterudPerson-Centred Quality Indicators Patient Advisory Council, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Paul FairieDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Maria J SantanaDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective primary care improves patient outcomes by providing comprehensive, continuous, and person-centred care. The Patient's Medical Home vision positions primary care as the central entry point to high-quality health care in Canada. In Alberta, Person-centred Care Quality Indicators (PC-QIs) were developed with patients and health system stakeholders, are being implemented across the province to assess and report patient experiences in primary care. To ensure that patients are central to this work, a PC-QI patient Advisory Council (PAC) was created.

methodsThe PC-QI PAC was formed in 2024 to support the provincial implementation of PC-QIs in primary care. The council included ten total members, eight patient research partners and two academic researchers, who co-developed a living Terms of Reference to guide the PAC's operations. Monthly PAC meetings (later adapted to quarterly meetings with monthly newsletters) and working group meetings supported engagement. The patient engagement was evaluated twice using the Patient Engagement in Research Scale.

resultsThe PC-QI PAC contributed to the development of the Terms of Reference, research participant recruitment strategies, co-development of study materials, knowledge translation activities, and research dissemination. Members also co-authored abstracts, posters, and manuscripts, and participated in academic conferences and meetings. Key facilitators of engagement included the co-developed Terms of References, transparent communication, flexible participation in working groups, appropriate compensation, and leadership roles for patient co-chairs. Identified challenges included maintaining clarity of roles, sustaining engagement in virtual settings, and ensuring that members' contributions to the broader project were clearly communicated and understood.

conclusionBy managing expectations, co-developing operations, and thoughtfully sharing information, the research team built meaningful, trustworthy, and long-lasting partnerships with patient partners, which benefited every team member and the research project. This study aims to describe and analyze the co-development and work of the PC-QI PAC to identify factors that shape meaningful patient engagement in the design and implementation of research in primary care, contributing to the limited evidence on this topic.

Indexed as

Patient advisory councilPatient engagementPatient-oriented researchPerson-centered quality indicatorsPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID42665806
PMCPMC13525678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.