ArticleJournal of environmental quality
The spatial and temporal distribution of Staphylococcus aureus along a tropical Hawaiian watershed.
Article in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The spatial and temporal distribution of Staphylococcus aureus along a tropical Hawaiian watershed.Journal of environmental qualityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of community-acquired skin and soft-tissue infections worldwide. One major route of exposure is recreating in marine waters, but knowledge is limited regarding the drivers of S. aureus in surface waters that discharge into marine environments. This study explores spatial and temporal distributions of S. aureus, including antimicrobial-resistant and virulence genes, using both culture-dependent and molecular techniques across a tropical Hawaiian watershed with a gradient of human influence. Negative binomial generalized linear mixed models revealed that the interaction between spatial and temporal factors was the strongest predictor of S. aureus and associated genes. Cultured S. aureus was highest at mid-watershed sites in summer, which included a popular swimming hole, suggesting human shedding as a significant source. Molecular detection of S. aureus (femA gene) yielded concentrations two orders of magnitude higher than cultured concentrations and peaked at estuarine sites with the greatest nutrients and water residence times. In the winter at upstream sites with no public access, staphylococci antibiotic-resistant (mecA) and S. aureus virulence gene (etb) were elevated, indicating highly pathogenic S. aureus strains in surface waters may originate from zoonotic sources. Our findings indicate that human and zoonotic sources contribute antibiotic-resistant and virulent S. aureus to watersheds, with streams facilitating environmental transmission to marine waters. This watershed-scale assessment enables the prediction of spatial and temporal conditions associated with elevated S. aureus concentrations, thereby reducing exposure and infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.