SynthesisArchives of sexual behavior2026
Instruments Used to Measure Sexual Identity Minority Stress: A COSMIN Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review evaluates the psychometric properties of instruments used to measure minority stress in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer (LGBQ) populations. A systematic search identified measurement instruments for dimensions of minority stress in adult LGBQ populations. The instruments were evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. Eight out of 105 instruments qualified for appraisal. The Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale (LGBIS) and its German adaptation, LGBIS-DE, demonstrated the strongest psychometric properties and are recommended for use. However, the review indicated notable variation in how minority stress was conceptualized and operationalized across instruments. Additionally, content validity, as defined by COSMIN, has not been sufficiently explored, compromising the robustness of many instruments. This review highlights the need for greater standardization in the definition of minority stress constructs and a greater focus on content validity in future research. While the LGBIS and LGBIS-DE demonstrated strong psychometric properties, data were not available for all psychometric categories, particularly for reliability and responsiveness. Further research is needed to further validate the instruments included. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42021257995.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.