ArticleMolecular diversity2026
Integrated multi-omics, machine learning, network toxicology, and molecular docking reveal potential mechanisms underlying methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate-associated breast cancer.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) represents a major public-health burden, and epidemiological evidence suggests a potential association with exposure to methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate (MEP), a widely-used cosmetic preservative and estrogen-mimicking endocrine-disrupting chemical. Nevertheless, the potential mechanisms underlying MEP-associated BC oncogenesis and progression remain poorly understood. BC-related targets were curated from CTD, GeneCards, and OMIM, whereas MEP-related targets were interrogated from ChEMBL, PharmMapper, and SEA using stringent filters. The intersecting targets informed subsequent protein-protein interaction network construction and molecular docking studies. Subsequently, consensus molecular subtypes of BC were derived by applying ten clustering algorithms to multi-omics data, which were subsequently employed in three machine learning algorithms to develop a consensus MEP-related signature (CMEPRS) for BC patients. Five core putative toxicological targets (HSP90AA1, CTNNB1, TP53, MYC, and EGFR) with critical regulatory roles in MEP-associated molecular alterations were identified. Based on these findings, we generated MEP-toxicity-related classifiers and the CMEPRS prognostic model, which may facilitate patient stratification and support personalized clinical management for BC patients. The high-CMEPRS patients displayed prominent infiltration of macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and cancer-associated fibroblasts. Apart from lapatinib, the high-CMEPRS patients showed higher predicted sensitivity to most conventional chemotherapeutic drugs. This computational study provides preliminary insights into molecular alterations linked to MEP exposure and offers a feasible analytical framework for patient stratification and therapeutic-target exploration in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42665765What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.