ArticleMolecular diversity2026
Interpretable QSAR modelling for PPAR-γ agonist prediction by integrating a stacking strategy, docking, and MD simulations.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) is a ligand-activated nuclear receptor involved in adipogenesis, glucose homeostasis, lipid metabolism, and inflammation, making it an important therapeutic target for metabolic disorders. However, the complex pharmacology of PPAR-γ presents significant challenges for rational drug discovery. In this study, we developed Meta-iPPAR, an integrative in silico framework combining stacked machine learning, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for the identification of PPAR-γ agonists. Meta-iPPAR was constructed using diverse SMILES-based molecular descriptors and multiple machine learning algorithms integrated through a stacking strategy. The proposed model achieved strong predictive performance on the independent test set, with an ACC of 0.926, AUC of 0.965, and MCC of 0.848. Scaffold analysis and SHAP interpretation further identified important chemotypes and molecular features associated with PPAR-γ activation. Large-scale virtual screening of more than 36,000 compounds from the natural product atlas identified three promising fungal-derived candidates. Subsequent docking and 300 ns MD simulations demonstrated stable binding conformations and favorable interactions with key residues in the PPAR-γ ligand-binding domain, comparable to known agonists and co-crystal ligands. Collectively, these findings suggest that Meta-iPPAR provides a reliable computational framework for screening and prioritizing potential PPAR-γ agonists in early-stage drug discovery. Future experimental validation and biological evaluation of the identified compounds are warranted. We anticipate that Meta-iPPAR will be an effective computational tool for screening and prioritizing potential compounds targeting PPAR-γ in the early stage of drug development pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42665762What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.