ArticleMolecular diversity2026
Machine learning-driven drug repurposing and computational validation for Nipah virus.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The recurring Nipah virus outbreaks and the lack of effective antiviral therapies, emphasize the urgent need for effective therapeutic interventions. Given the sporadic and unpredictable nature of NiV outbreaks, drug repurposing offers a time-efficient alternative to the development of novel antivirals. In this study, we leveraged machine learning (ML) techniques to accelerate the process of identifying potential therapeutic candidates. Several supervised ML models such as Support Vector Machines, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, k-Nearest Neighbors, Artificial Neural Networks, and Ridge Classifier were implemented using publicly available NiV inhibitor datasets (viz. Anti-Nipah, NVIK, PubChem) as well as literature review (n = 211 compounds). Among these, the Random Forest model demonstrated highest predictive performance, achieving high accuracy on both training (95%) and testing (86%) datasets. The optimized model was subsequently applied to screen FDA-approved, preclinical, clinical, and antiviral drug libraries (comprising 9021 compounds) to identify potential anti-NiV candidates. The shortlisted compounds underwent further validation through molecular docking to evaluate binding affinity and molecular dynamics simulations to assess structural stability and interactions with key viral targets, including the glycoprotein and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). Based on docking scores and molecular dynamics stability, we identified three and five promising candidates: 2,3,4,5,6-Pentagalloylglucose, Echinacoside, Parishin A, and Neohesperidin dihydrochalcone, Naringin dihydrochalcone, Diosmin, Orientin, Amikacin, against the glycoprotein and RdRp respectively. This integrative approach, combining ML, drug repurposing, and computational validation, aims to expedite the discovery of effective therapeutic agents against the Nipah virus and strengthen preparedness for future outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42665761What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.