ArticleMolecular neurobiology2026
Targeting the PARP1-p53 Axis Could Mitigate Necrotic-Apoptotic Signaling and Secondary Neurodegeneration After Spinal Cord Injury.
Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Overactivation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) contributes to secondary injury after spinal cord injury (SCI) by promoting energy depletion and necrotic cell death. Although PARP1 inhibitors have shown neuroprotective effects, their functional benefits remain modest, and the underlying reasons are poorly understood. This study was conducted in two phases using a rat contusion SCI model. Phase I evaluated a biphasic intraperitoneal dosing regimen of the PARP1 inhibitor 3-aminobenzamide (3-AB), based on the temporal profile of PARP1 activation, through behavioral and histological assessments. As only insignificant improvement was observed, phase II employed a reverse translational approach to investigate the molecular basis of this limited efficacy. Western blot analysis was performed following intraparenchymal administration of 3-AB alone or combined with the p53 inhibitor pifithrin-µ (PFT-µ) to examine proteins associated with necrotic and apoptotic signaling. Phase I showed only modest, statistically insignificant improvements in locomotor recovery and tissue preservation with 3-AB treatment. Phase II demonstrated that PARP1 inhibition alone was associated with increased p53-mediated apoptotic signaling, whereas combined PARP1 and p53 inhibition more effectively reduced such apoptotic signaling by perturbing apoptosis-inducing factor translocation, cytochrome c release, and caspase-dependent apoptotic activation. These findings indicate that dual inhibition suppresses injury-associated cell death pathways more effectively than PARP1 inhibition alone. These findings suggest that interactions between PARP1 and p53 signaling may limit the therapeutic efficacy of PARP1-inhibition monotherapy after SCI and support further investigation of combined PARP1 and p53 inhibition as a potential therapeutic strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42665756What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.