Observational studyWorld journal of urology2026
Artificial intelligence-based prediction of stone-free status in patients undergoing mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy without retrograde insertion of a ureteral catheter.
Observational study in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) predictive model for postoperative stone-free status (SFS) specifically in patients undergoing mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy without retrograde insertion of a ureteral catheter (mPCNL-nRUC).
methodsThis single-center prospective observational study included 181 patients with upper urinary tract stones who underwent mPCNL-nRUC between March 2019 and March 2025. Preoperative clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were collected. Five machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed to construct SFS prediction models. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared with Guy's stone score and S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry system. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used for interpretability analysis of the optimal model.
resultsAll surgeries successfully established percutaneous renal access without intraoperative conversion to retrograde ureteral catheter insertion. The immediate postoperative stone-free rate (SFR) was 72.93% (132/181). The overall complication rate was 24.31%, with the majority being Clavien‑Dindo grade I or II. Among the five models, the support vector machine (SVM) model demonstrated the best predictive performance with AUC of 0.875, significantly outperforming Guy's stone score (AUC = 0.659, p < 0.001) and S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry system (AUC = 0.770, p = 0.005). The best-performing SVM model has been deployed on an openly accessible online platform to facilitate clinical application. SHAP analysis revealed that stone burden, preoperative serum creatinine, preoperative white blood cell count, stone complexity, and hydronephrosis were the most critical predictors of SFS.
conclusionmPCNL-nRUC is a safe, effective, and simplified procedure in selected patients. The interpretable AI model provides a powerful tool for clinical individualized decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42665740What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.