Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42665737›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2026

Real World Data and Its Impact on the Management of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias.

Naveen Subramanian, Samuel M Rubinstein

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Naveen SubramanianDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Samuel M RubinsteinDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. samuel_rubinstein@med.unc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe field of plasma cell dyscrasias has undergone dramatic evolution in recent yeast due to rapid therapeutic advances. While exciting, the growth of novel therapeutic strategies has created significant evidence gaps which cannot all be feasibly addressed with dedicated prospective trials. The role of real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) in informing management has thus also expanded. We aim to review the use of RWD and RWE in PCD management. RECENT

findingsRWD has been used significantly to assess short- and long-term toxicities associated with rapidly expanding treatment modalities such as cellular therapies that were not explored in RCTs. Other RWE has shown that clinical efficacy of newer treatment options is maintained in patient populations that would be excluded from RCT participation. RWE has also lent greater support for and generated new ideas for optimal therapeutic sequencing in PCD. Furthermore, RWE has allowed for the development of treatment ideas for less common PCD that have not been studied in RCTs. The use of RWD and RWE in the field of PCDs has effectively supplemented the use of RCTs in expanding the treatment options available to combat PCDs. As this field continues to expand at a rapid pace, RWD and RWE will continue to be needed as a source of data to support new treatments.

Indexed as

ParaproteinemiasDisease ManagementHumansEvidence-based medicineMultiple myelomaPlasma cell dyscrasiasReal-world dataReal-world evidence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.