Trial reportBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2026
Comparison of the Risk of Acute Anterior Uveitis Flare Between Adalimumab and Subcutaneous Infliximab in Patients with Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis and Prior Acute Anterior Uveitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute anterior uveitis (AAU) is the most common extra-musculoskeletal manifestation of radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) and is an important consideration when selecting biological therapy. Although adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab are commonly used in patients with r-axSpA and AAU, direct comparative evidence, particularly between ADA and subcutaneous infliximab (IFX-SC), remains limited.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to compare the risk of AAU flare between ADA and IFX-SC in patients with r-axSpA and a history of AAU.
methodsThis multicenter, head-to-head, randomized, open-label trial enrolled patients with r-axSpA and a documented AAU event within the preceding 2 years. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ADA (40 mg every 2 weeks) or IFX-SC (intravenous 5 mg/kg induction followed by subcutaneous 120 mg every 2 weeks) and were followed for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was AAU flare occurrence. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Secondary endpoints included changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), r-axSpA disease activity and functional indices, and safety outcomes.
resultsFifty-six patients were randomized (ADA, n = 28; IFX-SC, n = 28). During follow-up, one AAU flare episode occurred in each group. The adjusted HR of IFX-SC (vs ADA) for an AAU flare was 0.496 (95% confidence interval 0.025-9.768, p = 0.645). No significant differences in secondary endpoints were observed between groups (right BCVA, p = 0.622; left BCVA, p = 0.306; Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score, p = 0.293; Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, p = 0.262; Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, p = 0.307). Adverse events were similar in frequency and severity, with no new safety signals identified.
conclusionsNo statistically significant differences in AAU flare risk or secondary ocular and rheumatologic outcomes were observed between ADA and IFX-SC over 48 weeks in patients with r-axSpA and prior AAU. These findings suggest that IFX-SC may represent a potential alternative to ADA for AAU flare prevention as well as disease activity control in this population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea; KCT0007239.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42665722What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.